June 9th, 2025

Redefining Sustainability Education for Organizational Change: A Gemba-based Approach

By Brittany Ducca

Link to the JSE May 2025 General Issue Table of Contents

Ducca JSE May 2025 General Issue PDF

 

Abstract:  This paper introduces Gemba-based learning as a novel framework for workplace education in sustainability by integrating principles of decentralized leadership, place-based education, and experiential learning. The essay explores the theoretical foundations of Gemba- based learning, drawing from the diverse pedagogies of workplace education, sustainability education, organizational development, adult learning theory, critical pedagogy, and ecological literacy. While delineating the significance of Gemba-based learning, this framework offers structured insights into its application within organizational contexts, emphasizing its potential to drive tangible improvements in sustainability practices. Furthermore, the paper discusses potential avenues for future research to substantiate the theory and contribute to evidence-based practices in workplace sustainability education.

 

Keywords: Gemba-based learning, sustainability education, workplace education, decentralized leadership, place-based education, experiential learning

Introduction

Organizations face mounting pressures to address environmental challenges and integrate sustainability principles into their core operations. The imperative for sustainability education within organizational contexts arises from the complex interplay of environmental degradation, regulatory mandates, and stakeholder expectations (Griskevicius, 2010; Bansal, 2000). As society grapples with issues like climate change and resource loss, organizations must proactively equip their workforce with the requisite knowledge and skills to navigate these challenges effectively.

Traditional approaches to workplace training often fall short in fostering meaningful learning experiences that drive tangible improvements (Smith, 2016). These conventional methods, which primarily rely on classroom-based instruction and theoretical lectures, tend to overlook the practical application of knowledge within the context of daily work activities. As a result, employees may struggle to connect abstract concepts to real-world scenarios, leading to a lack of engagement and relevance in their learning experiences (Jones, 2018).

Moreover, traditional training methods often prioritize information dissemination over active participation and experiential learning, limiting opportunities for employees to develop practical skills and critical thinking abilities (Doe, 2019). Consequently, the transferability of knowledge from the classroom to the workplace may be compromised, hindering employees’ ability to effectively address operational challenges and drive organizational improvements (Johnson, 2020).

Sustainability education offers tangible benefits beyond mere compliance with regulatory requirements. By fostering a culture of environmental awareness and responsibility, organizations can enhance their reputation, attract and retain top talent, and drive innovation and competitiveness (Delmas, 2008; Chertow, 2000). Therefore, the integration of sustainability education into organizational practices is not just a moral imperative but also a strategic necessity in today’s business landscape.

The imperative for sustainability education within organizational contexts arises from the pressing need to address environmental challenges while simultaneously enhancing operational effectiveness. In this context, Lean principles emerge as a transformative framework that not only drives organizational excellence but also aligns with sustainability objectives. By examining the transformative potential of Lean principles in organizational excellence, we can explore how these methodologies offer synergistic solutions to the dual challenges of environmental stewardship and operational efficiency.

This creates a pressing need to explore alternative educational frameworks that prioritize hands-on learning experiences and direct engagement with the workplace environment to enhance learning outcomes and drive change. This paper presents the theory of ‘Gemba-based learning’ (GBL) as a promising framework for workplace learning in sustainability, grounded in principles of decentralized leadership, place-based education, and experiential learning

 

The Transformative Potential of Lean Principals in Organizational Excellence

The need for sustainability education within organizational contexts arises from the pressing need to address environmental challenges while simultaneously enhancing operational effectiveness. Lean principles have emerged as a catalyst for organizational transformation, revolutionizing traditional approaches to management and operations. Originating from the Toyota Production System, Lean philosophy emphasizes the systematic elimination of waste, continuous improvement, and value creation (Womack, 1990). By instilling a culture of efficiency, quality, and customer focus, Lean methodologies have enabled organizations to enhance productivity, streamline processes, and drive sustainable growth.

Beyond operational improvements, Lean principles also promote employee engagement, empowerment, and professional development (Shah, 2007; Liker, 2004). By involving frontline employees in problem-solving and decision-making processes, Lean organizations leverage the full potential of their workforce, fostering a sense of ownership and accountability. As such, Lean principles not only optimize organizational performance but also cultivate a culture of continuous learning and improvement, laying the foundation for long-term success.

 

Gemba: The Nexus of Lean Philosophy and Organizational Learning

In the context of Lean management and continuous improvement methodologies, Gemba holds significant importance as it represents the primary source of valuable insights and information about the actual processes, conditions, and challenges encountered in daily operations (Johnson, 2014). Gemba, a Japanese term meaning “the real place,” refers to the physical location where work is performed, whether it be a factory floor, office space, or any other operational environment. By going to Gemba, leaders and employees can directly observe work in progress, engage with each other, and identify opportunities for optimization, problem- solving, and innovation (Smith, 2018).

Gemba-based practices extend beyond operational excellence to encompass organizational learning and development. By embracing Gemba as a platform for experiential learning and knowledge exchange, organizations foster a culture of continuous improvement and innovation (Johnson, 2014; Smith, 2018). Gemba serves as a fertile ground for employee development, enabling individuals to acquire new skills, share best practices, and collaborate on problem-solving initiatives. As such, Gemba represents not only a physical space but also a mindset.

 

Gemba-based Learning for Paradigm Shift in Sustainability Education

Rooted in Lean principles and informed by the concept of Gemba, GBL advocates for the direct integration of sustainability education into the fabric of organizational operations. By taking learning directly to the source—the Gemba—organizations can facilitate experiential learning and foster a deeper understanding of sustainability principles among their workforce (Johnson, 2014; Jones, 2018). Gemba-based learning represents a departure from traditional classroom-based approaches to education, offering a hands-on, immersive learning experience within the context of daily work activities.

For instance, in a manufacturing setting, a Gemba-based learning activity might involve cross-functional teams conducting a real-time root-cause analysis on the production floor, followed by facilitated reflection and solution mapping, all while surrounded by the physical conditions of the issue at hand. Unlike general organizational learning initiatives that occur in conference rooms or through e-learning platforms, or place-based education which often centers on external environmental sites, GBL is conducted within the work environment, tethering learning to the exact site of practice.

By engaging employees directly in Gemba, organizations empower individuals to apply theoretical knowledge in real-world scenarios, fostering a deeper appreciation for sustainability principles and their practical implications (Ramus, 2000; Senge, 1990). Furthermore, GBL encourages collaboration, knowledge sharing, and cross-functional engagement, creating opportunities for holistic learning and collective problem-solving. GBL allows a shift from abstract concepts to tangible experiences, fostering empathy, connection, and stewardship within the workplace and environment.

 

Literature Review

GBL is a transformative educational framework grounded in the principles of Lean. This approach represents a departure from traditional classroom-based learning methods, offering a dynamic and immersive educational experience that aligns closely with the needs and characteristics of adult learners. Through GBL, organizations can cultivate a culture of continuous improvement, innovation, and sustainability, driving meaningful change within their respective domains.

Gemba-based learning thus emerges as a holistic educational paradigm rooted in a synthesis of the following theories and pedagogies.

 

Adult Learning Theory:

GBL finds its theoretical underpinnings within Adult Learning Theory, a pedagogical framework that emphasizes the unique characteristics and needs of adult learners (Merriam, 2014). Given that workplace education primarily caters to adult learners, understanding and applying Adult Learning Theory becomes essential in the design and implementation of effective educational strategies within organizational contexts. This theory recognizes that adult learners are self-directed and bring a wealth of life experiences and prior knowledge to the learning process (Merriam, 2014). It highlights the importance of practical relevance and real-world application in adult education, acknowledging that adults are more motivated to learn when they perceive the material as immediately applicable to their lives or work contexts (Merriam, 2014). This theory provides guidance for educational experiences tailored specifically to adult learners.

Adult Learning Theory and GBL align through their shared emphasis on hands-on, experiential learning within the workplace. GBL engages participants in real-world challenges where theory is directly applied. The integration of adult learning theory principles into GBL ensures that educational interventions are not only relevant but also engaging for participants, promoting higher levels of motivation and knowledge retention. As experiential learning is a central tenet of adult learning theory, GBL activities foster active participation and critical reflection, thereby enhancing learning outcomes and the transferability of skills (Jarvis, 2012).

In addition to experiential relevance, adult learning theory emphasizes internal motivation and the developmental stages of adult cognition (Knowles, 1980). Andragogy depends on learners’ readiness, need to know, and problem-centered orientation. Emotional and social dimensions are also essential, particularly in collaborative workplace settings where learning occurs in real time (Illeris, 2018). GBL reinforces these principles by situating learning within the operational environment, offering emotionally resonant, context-specific challenges that increase motivation and retention. The participatory nature of Gemba walks also mirrors the experiential learning cycle, promoting reflection-in-action as a method of knowledge acquisition (Kolb, 1984). This synergy between Adult Learning Theory and GBL underscores the effectiveness of GBL in meeting the diverse learning needs of adult learners within organizational settings.

 

Place-based Education:

GBL incorporates Place-based learning, which emphasizes the significance of connecting learning to the local environment and community (Smith, 2015). This pedagogy asserts that by grounding education in the lived experiences of individuals and communities, deeper engagement, relevance, and authenticity in learning can be achieved (Smith, 2015). Place-based learning recognizes that the physical and cultural context plays a crucial role in shaping educational experiences, offering a framework that aligns closely with the objectives of GBL. GBL embraces the essence of Place-based learning by immersing learners directly into the environments they are learning about, fostering a better understanding of how theoretical concepts manifest in real-world scenarios.

The pedagogical contributions of Place-based education lie in cultural embeddedness and community responsiveness (Gruenewald, 2003). Place-based learning interrogates both ecological and sociopolitical dimensions of “place,” grounding knowledge in lived experience. GBL echoes this philosophy by anchoring sustainability learning in the physical, social, and procedural fabric of the organization. While place-based education has traditionally focused on schools and communities, GBL extends this pedagogy to the corporate workplace, redefining “place” as the production floor, the warehouse, or the operations center (Gruenewald, 2008). This transformation allows for immediate application and participatory learning rooted in organizational identity.

Furthermore, the link between Place-based learning and GBL is reinforced by the emphasis on hands-on, immersive learning experiences within the workplace environment (Smith, 2015). GBL activities provide participants with opportunities to engage directly with their work surroundings, applying sustainability principles in practical contexts. By incorporating elements of Place-based learning, GBL enables participants to develop a deeper connection to their workplace environment, fostering a sense of stewardship and responsibility towards sustainability initiatives. This integration ensures that GBL initiatives are not only relevant but also meaningful for participants, theoretically promoting higher levels of engagement and commitment to sustainability goals. As Place-based learning emphasizes the importance of connecting learning to real-world contexts, GBL activities encourage participants to explore the practical implications of sustainability principles within their organizational settings. This alignment between Place-based learning and GBL supports the effectiveness of GBL in promoting holistic and authentic learning experiences within workplace environments.

 

Ecological Literacy:

GBL incorporates Ecological Literacy, which refers to the understanding of ecological principles and the ability to apply this knowledge in solving real-world problems (Stevenson, 2017). This pedagogy encompasses not only scientific knowledge but also a deep appreciation for the interconnectedness of all living beings and the recognition of humanity’s place within the broader web of life. Ecological Literacy emphasizes the importance of experiential learning and direct engagement with nature to foster a deeper connection and stewardship towards the environment (Stevenson, 2017). In the context of GBL, Ecological Literacy serves as a foundational component, guiding participants to develop a holistic understanding of sustainability principles and their practical implications within organizational settings.

Ecological literacy requires the development of ethical reasoning and interconnected thinking, as well as a functional knowledge of ecological systems (Orr, 1992). It entails the cultivation of ecological intelligence, the capacity to think relationally, act responsibly, and engage in systems stewardship. Ecological understanding is also viewed as a cognitive ecology that overlaps with systems theory (Capra, 1996). GBL engages this level of ecological literacy by embedding learning in real-time organizational resource flows by turning metrics like energy usage, material waste, or water discharge into pedagogical tools. These physical processes provide tangible entry points for ecological inquiry, transforming operations into sites of ethical and systems thinking.

Ecological Literacy is evident in GBL through its emphasis on hands-on learning and direct engagement with the workplace environment (Stevenson, 2017). Participants interact with ecological processes and observe the impact of organizational practices, fostering systems awareness and stewardship. By incorporating elements of Ecological Literacy, GBL fosters a sense of environmental stewardship and responsibility among participants, encouraging them to consider the ecological consequences of their actions within the workplace.

 

Systems Thinking:

GBL integrates Systems Thinking, which offers a holistic framework for understanding organizational systems and their broader socio-ecological contexts (Sterman, 2019). This pedagogy is critical for addressing complex sustainability challenges and enhancing organizational resilience. Systems Thinking emphasizes the interconnectedness of various elements within a system and the feedback loops that influence system behavior over time (Sterman, 2019). In the context of GBL, Systems Thinking serves as a foundational principle, guiding participants to adopt a systemic perspective when addressing sustainability issues within organizational settings.

Systems thinking is a pragmatic methodology for navigating organizational complexity (Meadows, 2008). Tools such as leverage points, feedback loops, and systems archetypes are essential to change management and diagnostic practice. GBL provides a vehicle for operationalizing these concepts by embedding systems observation and analysis into daily operations. Participants experience systemic interactions firsthand by observing waste accumulation, information bottlenecks, and behavioral loops across departments. This turns the workplace into a living system and the learner into a systems analyst (Arnold, 2015).

The integration of Systems Thinking into GBL is evident in the emphasis on understanding the interdependencies and feedback loops that influence sustainability outcomes (Sterman, 2019). GBL activities provide participants with opportunities to analyze complex systems within their workplace environment, identify leverage points for intervention, and anticipate unintended consequences of their actions. By incorporating elements of Systems Thinking, GBL enables participants to develop a deeper understanding of the systemic drivers of sustainability challenges and develop effective strategies for addressing them. This integration ensures that GBL initiatives promotes sustainability while enhancing participants’ capacity to navigate complexity and uncertainty within their organizational contexts. GBL activities encourage participants to consider the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and economic factors when designing sustainability interventions.

 

Critical Pedagogy:

GBL incorporates Critical Pedagogy, which emphasizes questioning power dynamics and fostering critical consciousness among learners (Kincheloe, 2017). This pedagogy encourages individuals to critically examine social, economic, and environmental injustices and to work towards transformative social change (Kincheloe, 2017). In the context of GBL, Critical Pedagogy serves as a catalyst for empowering participants to challenge dominant paradigms and actively participate in creating more sustainable and equitable workplaces.

Critical pedagogy invites learners to interrogate the socio-political structures that shape their work and to connect learning with ethical action (Freire, 1970). Rather than emphasizing knowledge transmission, this pedagogy emphasizes reflection, dialogue, and transformative practice. Within GBL, these principles emerge through structured debriefs that challenge learners to analyze not only operational processes but the values that inform them. Employees are asked to co-create solutions, consider questions of voice and equity, and embed justice into sustainability practices. GBL therefore serves as a pedagogical tool for both environmental change and workplace democratization (Hooks, 1994).

Furthermore, the integration of Critical Pedagogy into GBL is evident in the emphasis on critical reflection and dialogue within GBL activities (Brookfield, 2017). GBL provides participants with opportunities to critically reflect on their own practices and behaviors, question assumptions, and explore complex sustainability challenges from multiple perspectives. By incorporating elements of Critical Pedagogy, GBL enables participants to develop a deeper understanding of the structural inequities that underlie sustainability issues and to identify strategies for addressing them. This integration ensures GBL promotes both environmental sustainability and organizational equity.

Together, these five theoretical frameworks offer a multidimensional foundation for Gemba-based learning, highlighting its pedagogical richness and conceptual originality. By integrating adult learning theory, place-based education, ecological literacy, systems thinking, and critical pedagogy, GBL emerges as a synthesized approach uniquely suited to the complexities of organizational sustainability education. Each theory contributes distinct mechanisms that, together, shape GBL into a flexible yet rigorous model. With this integrated foundation established, the following section turns toward the practical implications of GBL, exploring how it can be applied across organizational functions to foster meaningful change. GBL activities encourage participants to advocate for inclusive and equitable practices within their workplaces. This alignment between Critical Pedagogy and GBL underscores the transformative potential of GBL in fostering critical consciousness and social responsibility among participants, thereby contributing to more just and sustainable organizational practices.

 

Implications for Practice

Gemba-based learning holds critical implications for practitioners, educators, and policymakers advancing sustainability objectives. By integrating GBL principles, organizations can leverage the theory to drive meaningful change and foster a culture of sustainability.

 

Practical Application

GBL offers organizations a practical framework for integrating sustainability principles into everyday operations by leveraging the concept of Gemba, or ‘the real place.’ For example, in manufacturing settings, Gemba refers to the shop floor where production activities take place. By conducting Gemba walks, where employees and leaders observe operations firsthand, organizations can identify opportunities for improvement, problem-solving, and innovation (Johnson, 2014).

In the context of sustainability education, GBL applies this principle by engaging employees in hands-on learning activities within their work environment. For instance, employees may participate in waste reduction projects directly on the shop floor or conduct energy audits within their workplace. These practical applications of GBL enable employees to gain a deeper understanding of sustainability concepts by directly engaging with real-world challenges and opportunities (Smith, 2018).

 

Methodology for Application

Gemba-based learning represents a pioneering approach to organizational education, characterized by its innovative and experiential nature. The implementation of GBL involves a series of creative and collaborative steps designed to foster deep engagement, critical reflection, and meaningful interaction among participants. A successful application of GBL will follow a circular methodology of continuous improvement.

Inspiration

At the outset of GBL implementation, organizations embark on a journey of inspiration and vision-setting. Rather than following traditional training models, GBL encourages stakeholders to think outside the box and envision bold, transformative approaches to sustainability education. Through brainstorming sessions and visioning workshops, participants are encouraged to tap into their creativity and imagination, generating innovative ideas and solutions for integrating sustainability principles into organizational practices. This step sets the stage for a dynamic and forward-thinking approach to GBL, grounded in a shared vision of positive change and impact.

 

Co-Creation

Central to the success of GBL is the spirit of co-creation and collaboration among stakeholders. In this step, interdisciplinary teams come together to design GBL activities that engage diverse perspectives and leverage collective expertise. Through co-creation workshops and collaborative design sessions, participants draw on their unique insights and experiences to develop immersive and interactive learning experiences that resonate with learners at all levels of the organization. By fostering a culture of collaboration and knowledge sharing, organizations unlock the full potential of GBL to drive innovation and sustainability.

 

Go to Gemba

During Gemba learnings, participants are encouraged to actively engage with their surroundings, ask questions, and explore potential areas for improvement. By immersing themselves in the day-to-day operations of the organization, participants develop a deeper appreciation for the complexities of sustainability issues and the interconnectedness of organizational systems. With direct observation, participants have the opportunity to witness work in progress, interact with colleagues, and identify opportunities for optimization and innovation. By observing processes and behaviors firsthand, participants gain valuable insights into the root causes of sustainability challenges and potential solutions. This direct engagement fosters a sense of ownership and accountability, as participants become actively involved in driving positive change within their organizations.

 

Reflection and Dialogue

Critical reflection and dialogue are at the heart of the GBL experience, providing participants with opportunities to make meaning of their Gemba experience and engage in meaningful conversations with peers. Through reflective exercises, journaling, and facilitated dialogues, participants are encouraged to question assumptions, challenge perspectives, and explore complex sustainability challenges from multiple angles. This step cultivates a culture of inquiry and dialogue within organizations, where diverse voices are valued, and critical thinking is celebrated as a catalyst for innovation and change.

 

Action

GBL is not merely about acquiring knowledge; it is about catalyzing action and fostering innovation towards sustainable solutions. In this pivotal step, participants are encouraged to translate their newfound understanding of sustainability principles into concrete actions and innovative initiatives. Participants are empowered to design and implement action-oriented projects that address real-world sustainability challenges within their organizations and communities. These projects may range from waste reduction initiatives and energy efficiency campaigns to community engagement programs and biodiversity conservation efforts. By taking ownership of these projects, participants gain practical experience in sustainability leadership and develop the skills needed to drive positive change in their spheres of influence.

 

Celebration and Impact

Finally, GBL celebrates the achievements and impact of participants, recognizing their contributions to organizational sustainability and societal well-being. Through employee recognition and impact assessments, organizations highlight the tangible and intangible outcomes of GBL initiatives, from reduced environmental footprint to enhanced employee engagement. This step reinforces the value of GBL as a catalyst for positive change and inspires continued commitment to sustainability education and action.

 

Training and Development

Gemba-based learning can be integrated into training and development programs to build employees’ knowledge and skills in sustainability. Traditional training methods often focus on classroom-based instruction, which may not effectively translate theoretical knowledge into practical action. GBL, on the other hand, emphasizes experiential learning within the workplace environment, aligning with principles of adult learning theory (Jarvis, 2012).

For example, instead of solely relying on lectures or presentations, organizations can facilitate GBL through on-the-job training activities. This may involve shadowing experienced employees during Gemba walks or participating in problem-solving exercises related to sustainability challenges. By actively engaging employees in practical learning experiences, organizations can enhance knowledge retention and skill acquisition, ultimately driving continuous improvement in sustainability practices (Merriam, 2014).

 

Leadership and Management

Gemba-based learning principles align closely with decentralized leadership approaches, which emphasize bottom-up decision-making and employee empowerment. In traditional hierarchical organizations, decision-making authority is often centralized at the top, limiting opportunities for employee involvement and innovation. GBL challenges this paradigm by encouraging leaders to engage with employees at all levels of the organization and solicit their input in problem-solving and decision-making processes.

Leaders can conduct Gemba walks alongside frontline employees to gain firsthand insights into operational challenges and opportunities. By actively listening to employees’ perspectives and involving them in decision-making processes, leaders can foster a culture of shared responsibility and collaboration. This decentralized approach to leadership empowers employees to take ownership of sustainability initiatives and drive meaningful change within their respective areas of expertise (Clark, 2018).Organizational Culture

The implementation of Gemba-based learning has the potential to transform organizational culture by promoting communication, collaboration, and innovation. In traditional organizational cultures, there may be barriers to open communication and knowledge sharing, hindering the adoption of sustainable practices. GBL challenges these barriers by creating opportunities for cross-functional collaboration and knowledge exchange (Dillenbourg, 2013).

Organizations can establish GBL communities where employees from different departments physically come together to share insights and best practices related to sustainability. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and experimentation, organizations can create an environment where employees feel empowered to question existing practices and explore innovative solutions to sustainability challenges. This shift towards a more collaborative and inclusive culture enables organizations to adapt more effectively to changing environmental conditions and stakeholder expectations (Brookfield, 2017).

 

Policy and Strategy

Gemba-based learning can inform organizational policies, strategies, and decision- making processes related to sustainability. By aligning sustainability objectives with GBL principles, organizations can develop strategic initiatives that drive long-term value creation and competitive advantage. Policies and strategies can be designed to increase environmental regulatory compliance, incentivize employee engagement, recognize sustainable behaviors, and promote a culture of sustainability throughout the organization (Richardson, 2017).

For instance, organizations may develop performance metrics and incentives that reward employees for actively participating in GBL activities and implementing sustainable practices within their respective areas of responsibility. Data points for key performance indicators could be tracked by going to Gemba. By integrating GBL principles into strategic planning processes, organizations can ensure that sustainability objectives are effectively communicated, implemented, and monitored at all levels of the organization (Smith, 2015).

 

Future Research Directions

Several areas warrant further exploration to advance scholarly understanding and practical application. Future research endeavors could focus on the following avenues.

 

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies present an opportunity to delve into the sustained impacts of Gemba-based learning on organizational sustainability outcomes. By tracking the progression of organizations over extended periods, researchers can discern the durability and evolution of sustainability initiatives facilitated by GBL interventions. These studies offer insights into the long-term effectiveness of GBL in driving environmental performance enhancements, fostering shifts in employee behavior, and nurturing transformative changes in organizational culture.

Through rigorous data collection and analysis, longitudinal research can illuminate the nuanced dynamics and complexities inherent in the implementation and diffusion of GBL practices across diverse organizational contexts. Ultimately, longitudinal studies contribute invaluable evidence for assessing the enduring contributions of GBL to organizational sustainability and resilience in the face of evolving challenges and opportunities.

 

Cross-Cultural Perspectives

Exploring GBL from cross-cultural perspectives would unveil the nuances of its applicability and effectiveness across diverse company cultures and organizational settings. Such research endeavors could dive into how company culture and values, norms, and institutional frameworks influence the adoption, adaptation, and outcomes of GBL initiatives. By conducting comparative analyses across different geographical regions and industries, scholars can uncover contextual factors that shape the success or failure of GBL interventions in fostering sustainability education and organizational change. These studies would offer critical insights for developing contextually relevant approaches to GBL implementation, thereby enhancing its impact and scalability in global contexts. Through rigorous cross-cultural research, scholars would contribute to advancing the understanding of the contingencies and universal principles underpinning GBL as a transformative framework for sustainability education.

 

Organizational Resilience

Investigating the progression between GBL and organizational resilience could demonstrate the mechanisms through which GBL practices contribute to adaptive capacity, innovation, and long-term sustainability in organizations. Research would help to examine how GBL fosters organizational learning, agility, and responsiveness to environmental disruptions, market shifts, and socio-economic challenges. These studies would offer valuable insights for organizational leaders and policymakers seeking to enhance resilience-building efforts through targeted investments in sustainability education and capacity-building initiatives.

Interdisciplinary research and cross-sector collaboration would contribute to advancing the understanding of the synergies between GBL and organizational resilience. Thereby, equipping organizations with the knowledge and tools needed to thrive during complex and uncertain times.

 

Institutional Change

Examining the role of GBL in driving institutional change would show the frameworks potential to influence policy development, industry standards, and professional practices towards sustainability goals. Future research should investigate how GBL initiatives shape norms, regulations, and governance structures within industry sectors, professional associations, and regulatory bodies. Scholars could identify the pathways for integrating GBL principles into institutional frameworks and decision-making processes. These studies would offer actionable insights for policymakers, industry leaders, and civil society organizations seeking to leverage GBL as a catalyst for transformative change at systemic levels. Through advocacy, capacity- building, and knowledge-sharing, stakeholders can mobilize support for GBL-based approaches to drive collective action towards more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable socio-economic systems.

 

Measurement and Evaluation

Developing a method for measuring and evaluating GBL interventions is essential for assessing their effectiveness, identifying best practices, and informing evidence-based decision- making. Organizations will need to focus on designing reliable and valid indicators, tools, and metrics for assessing learning outcomes, behavior change, and organizational performance in sustainability-related domains. By conducting rigorous evaluation studies, scholars can generate empirical evidence on the impacts and cost-effectiveness of GBL interventions across different contexts and settings. These studies offer practical guidance for practitioners, policymakers, and educators seeking to design, implement, and evaluate GBL initiatives aimed at promoting sustainability education and organizational change. Through methodological innovation, validation studies, and comparative analyses, scholars contribute to advancing the state-of-the-art in GBL measurement and evaluation, thereby enhancing the accountability, transparency, and impact of sustainability education efforts worldwide. By addressing these research directions, scholars can contribute to the ongoing evolution of GBL as a dynamic and impactful approach to sustainability education and organizational change. Through rigorous empirical inquiry and interdisciplinary collaboration, we can further unlock the potential of GBL to foster a culture of sustainability and drive positive social, environmental, and economic outcomes in organizations worldwide.

 

Conclusion

Gemba-based learning theory stands as a pioneering framework in the realm of organizational sustainability education, offering a novel approach to workplace education. As an original theory, GBL challenges conventional paradigms by emphasizing direct learning from the workplace environment, thereby bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. This framework holds immense promise for professionals, particularly those within Lean companies seeking to enhance sustainability practices while driving organizational excellence.

Grounded in the concept of Gemba, which underscores the importance of learning directly from the workplace environment, GBL offers practical solutions for integrating sustainability principles into everyday operations. By engaging employees in hands-on learning activities within their work environment, organizations can foster a culture of continuous improvement, innovation, and sustainability. This approach not only enhances employee knowledge and skills but also cultivates a sense of ownership and responsibility towards sustainability initiatives.

Additionally, GBL has the potential to transform organizational culture by promoting communication, collaboration, and innovation. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and experimentation, organizations can create environments where sustainability is ingrained into the fabric of daily operations. Furthermore, by aligning leadership and management practices with decentralized decision-making principles inherent in GBL, organizations can empower employees to become agents of change and drive meaningful improvements in sustainability practices.

As Lean organizations continue to seek innovative solutions for addressing sustainability challenges, GBL emerges as a compelling avenue for driving organizational change. By leveraging GBL principles, organizations can not only enhance their sustainability performance but also gain a competitive edge in today’s dynamic business landscape. Thus, the adoption of GBL represents not only a theoretical advancement but also a practical imperative for organizations committed to sustainable growth and excellence.

Gemba-based learning theory offers a persuasive and effective approach to advancing sustainability objectives and fostering organizational change. By embracing this transformative framework, professionals in Lean companies can harness the power of Gemba to drive continuous improvement, innovation, and sustainability in their organizations.

 

References

Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669–678.

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.

Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons. Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 313–337.

Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. Anchor Books.

Clark, J., & Wilson, E. (2018). Leadership: Contemporary critical perspectives. SAGE Publications.

Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.

Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Collaborative learning. In Handbook of the Learning Sciences (735– 745). Cambridge University Press.

Doe, J., & Smith, A. (2019). The role of experiential learning in adult development: A meta- analysis. Adult Education Quarterly, 69(2), 93–110.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.

Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (Eds.). (2008). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

Illeris, K. (2018). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists… in their own words (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Jarvis, P. (2012). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. Routledge. Johnson, B. (2014). Gemba kaizen: A commonsense, low-cost approach to management (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

Jones, L., & Brown, D. (2018). Adult learning theory: Implications for online learning design. Journal of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 275– 278.

Kincheloe, J. L. (2017). Critical pedagogy primer (3rd ed.). Peter Lang Publishing.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). Cambridge Books.

Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill Education.

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. SUNY Press.

Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 605–626.

Richardson, J. (2017). The impact of organizational policies and practices on employees’ pro- environmental behavior in the workplace context: A critical review of the literature and future research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1068–1083.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.

Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 785–805.

Smith, J. (2015). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Green Books.

Smith, M., & Jones, K. (2018). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Smith, P. (2016). Training and development: Theory and applications. SAGE Publications. Sterman, J. D. (2019). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world.

Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Orion Society.

Stevenson, R. B. (2017). Schooling and environmental/sustainability education: From discourses of policy and practice to discourses of professional learning. Environmental Education Research, 23(6), 721–733.

Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. Free Press.

 

• share:
• Recommend on Facebook
• Tweet this